Inter Services Public Relations says the remarks of Indian Army Chief are an attempt to deflect world's attention from India's brutality in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, repression of minorities internally, and India's trans-national repression.

In a statement, it said that insinuating Pakistan as the epi-center of terrorism by the Indian Army Chief, is not only contrary to facts, but also an exercise in futility to beat the dead horse of India's default position - blaming Pakistan for indigenous reaction to state-sponsored brutality.

The ISPR further said it is a classic case of extreme duplicity. It said that the General Officer, in his earlier stint in lndian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir personally oversaw the most brutal repression of Kashmiris.

Such politically motivated and fallacious statements reflect the extreme politicization of Indian Army.

The world is witness to the India's hate-speech conclaves that provoke genocide against Muslims.

The ISPR added that international community is not oblivious to India's trans-national assassinations, and Indian Security Forces' oppressive use of force against innocent civilians and gross human rights violations against unarmed Kashmiris.

Such oppression has only served to strengthen the resolve of Kashmiris for their right of self-determination, enshrined in the UN Security Council Resolutions.

The ISPR said instead of trying to conjure up a non-existent terror infrastructure in Pakistan, it would be wise not to indulge in self-delusion, and appreciate the ground reality.

The sobering fact that a senior serving Indian military officer is in Pakistan's custody, caught red-handed while orchestrating acts of terror against innocent civilians inside Pakistan, seems to have been conveniently ignored by the General.

Pakistan takes strong exception to such baseless and unfounded statements.

Empathizing with the victims of Indian Army's brutality, the ISPR said it is hoped that civility, professionalism, and norms of state-to-state behavior would guide the conduct of Indian Army's leadership, rather than pandering to political exigencies.